The Mom Crowd

Mylicon Recall

posted by Amanda on November 13th, 2008

mylicon.jpegIf you have Mylicon Drops in your cabinet you need to check if they are ones being recalled. Apparently, some bits of metal have gotten into some bottles while manufacturing them.

This is from the Mylicon website:

JOHNSON & JOHNSON • MERCK CONSUMER PHARMACEUTICALS COMPANY ANNOUNCES URGENT VOLUNTARY NATIONWIDE RECALL OF INFANTS’ MYLICON® GAS RELIEF DYE FREE DROPS (SIMETHICONE-ANTIGAS) NON-STAINING DUE TO POSSIBLE METAL FRAGMENTS

Fort Washington, PA (November 10, 2008) – Johnson & Johnson • Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Company (JJMCP) is voluntarily recalling approximately 12,000 units of Infants’ MYLICON® GAS RELIEF DYE FREE drops (simethicone-antigas) non-staining sold in 1 oz. plastic bottles that were distributed after October 5, 2008 nationwide. The company is taking this action in consultation with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Although the potential for serious medical events is low, the company is implementing this recall to the consumer level as a precaution after determining that some bottles could include metal fragments that were generated during the manufacturing process. If any medical events were to occur, most are expected to be temporary and resolve without medical treatment. Parents who have given the product to their infant and are concerned should contact their health care provider immediately.

The two lots of Infants’ MYLICON® GAS RELIEF DYE FREE drops non-staining 1 oz. bottles included in the recall are:

Product Code # Lot # Exp Product
71683791111-1 SMF007 09/10 Infants’ MYLICON® Gas Relief Dye Free Non-Staining Drops 1 oz.
71683791111-1 SMF008 09/10 Infants’ MYLICON® Gas Relief Dye Free Non-Staining Drops 1 oz.

Consumers can find the lot numbers on the bottom of the box containing the product and also on the lower left side of the sticker on the product bottle.

Consumers who purchased Infants’ MYLICON® GAS RELIEF DYE FREE drops non-staining included in this recall should immediately stop using the product and contact the company at 1-800-222-9435 (Monday – Friday, 8:00 a.m. – 8:00 p.m. EST) or via the internet at www.mylicon.com for instructions regarding how to dispose of the product and request a replacement or refund.

Infants’ MYLICON® drops are sold over-the counter, in retail stores and pharmacies, as an anti-gas medicine to relieve the discomfort of infant gas frequently caused by air swallowing or by certain formulas or foods.

The recall does not affect any Original Infants’ MYLICON® GAS RELIEF products (1/2 oz. or 1 oz. size) or Infants’ MYLICON® GAS RELIEF DYE FREE drops non-staining (1/2 oz. size).

The manufacturer has instructed retailers and wholesalers to return their inventories.

Hot Kid Topics in The News: Cereal, Down syndrome, SIDS, and Child Medication

posted by Amanda on October 8th, 2008

cheerios.jpgMany of us don’t have time to read the paper or watch the news. (Most of it is fear-mongering anyway, but that is an entirely different story.) So I am sharing some headlines that have been in the news lately that may be of interest of interest to us moms. Starting off with one of my most favorite foods on the planet, cereal. Seriously, do you remember that episode of Seinfeld with Janeane Garofalo where she even orders cereal at a restaurant and eats it for lunch? I am close to loving cereal that much.

  • Consumer Reports Rates 27 Different Kids Cereal - Based on the cereal’s fiber, sugar, calories, and nutritional content in a serving the top four cereals are plain Cheerios, Kix, Life, and Honey Nut Cheerios (yay!). The worst cereals are Post’s Golden Crisp and Kellogg’s Honey Smacks, Apple Jacks, Fruit Loops, Cap’n Crunch, and Pops. You have to be a member of Consumer Reports to get the full report, but WebMD does a good job summarizes the report.
  • New Blood Tests During Early Pregnancy for Down syndrome - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences came out with a report yesterday from a few doctors who are testing the pregnant mother’s blood, because some of the fetus’ blood ends up in the mother’s blood. They are looking for extra chromosomes usually found in Down syndrome, Edward syndrome, Patau syndrome. They are hoping that their findings will help women be tested as early as 5 weeks and lessen the need for more invasive tests that could lead to miscarriages. For me, I can see the need for this, but it doesn’t effect me. I just recently turned down all those tests in my own pregnancy. I am going to have the baby either way. My fear is that almost 9o% of women diagnosed with a fetus with Down syndrome abort the baby. When they do get the DS confirmation and abort, the baby is pretty far along. So if this test does become common and women find out at 5 weeks that their baby has Down syndrome will the abortion rate rise or fall?
  • Letting Your Newborn Sleep With a Fan On May Reduce the Risk of SIDS - According to the report, “Young infants who sleep in bedrooms with fans have a lower risk of sudden infant death syndrome than babies who sleep in less well-ventilated rooms, new research shows. Investigators concluded that sleeping with a fan lowers SIDS risk by more than 70%.” The article says that a fan is not a substitute for placing them on their backs. The reports are interesting, because I know SIDS was a fear of mine and I am up for anything I can do reduce the risk. I am not sure I will be militant about this for my next little one, but it is something to consider.
  • More Controversy over Cough and Cold Meds for Children - We have already covered previous FDA findings here and here. Now the New York Times is reporting, “manufacturers of pediatric cough and cold medicines announced Tuesday that they would voluntarily change their products’ labels to say that they should not be used in children under the age of 4.” The FDA is considering taking some cough and cold medications off the shelves and making them available by prescription. However, none of this would actually take place for a few years if it did happen. The FDA also fears that adults will then give their children medication meant for adults instead and over medicating them. My daughter is still under 2, so I haven’t used any of them on her. I am more of a Tylenol and home remedy kind of mom.

What is your favorite cereal? Would you start using a fan now for reduce the risk of SIDS? Has the news about cough and cold medications changed your mind about using them? Or do you find that they work?

Olympian AND Mom

posted by McKenna on August 19th, 2008

1056922__olympics_.jpgI am obsessed with the Olympics! I am having so much fun watching the best in the world compete against one another. I am also amazed at how many moms are competing in Beijing right now. I had the privilege to meet Olympian and Mom, Liza Hunter-Galvan from New Zealand last month. She is joined by many moms in Beijing right now. Jennie Finch, Melanie Roach, Lisa Leslie, Lindsay Davenport, Kate Markgraf, and Tina Thompson are some of the other moms competing in Beijing while their little ones cheer them on.My very favorite Olympic mom is Dara Torres. Not only do I love her name, she has overcome that battle all moms fight in “losing the baby weight!” I actually went for a swim at the gym this week and have decided to add swimming to my work-outs because I want a body like hers. With her two year old, Tessa Grace cheering her on, she has won three silver medals in Beijing, bringing her total Olympic medal count to 12! How many people can say they’ve competed in FIVE Olympics? She’s an amazing athlete!!

Here’s some sites I’ve found talking about the Olympian Moms:

Olympic Moms Head to Beijing Slideshow

NBC’s Olympic Mothers Slideshow

ESPN-Athletes Balancing Motherhood and Olympic Dreams

Plenty of Olympic Moms in Beijing

Who is your favorite Olympic Mom? What has been your favorite Olympic moment?

Tropic Blunder! My Daughter IS NOT a Retard!

posted by McKenna on August 11th, 2008

Today has been very busy! Late last week, I learned about this new movie, Tropic Blunder Thunder. It’s full of big name celebrities including Ben Stiller, Jack Black, Robert Downey, Jr., Matthew McConaughey, Tom Cruise, etc… The movie is a comedy making fun of actors. The main characters are actors in the movie, so there are “movies-within-the movie.” Tropic Thunder used one of these “movies-within-the-movie,” titled “Simple Jack” for a promotional campaign. Simple Jack was about a person with an intellectual disability and used hateful language and depicted his character in cruel ways. The promotional campaign included posters stating “Once upon a time, there was a retard” and a trailer for viewing which has Christine Taylor’s voice saying “I’ll talk to any retard I like.” During the production of the film, the cast discussed their concern about some of the racial slurs and wanted to make sure they didn’t cross the line with the racial banter, however they did nothing to protect anyone from the cruelty shown toward individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Major disability rights organizations discovered this and met with DreamWorks to discuss their concern and outrage over “Simple Jack.” The promotional campaign was pulled, however there were no changes to the movie made. In the movie, Tropic Thunder, Ben Stiller’s character discusses his role as Simple Jack with Robert Downey, Jr. They discuss how Stiller stated that while making the film, he actually felt retarded. The two characters exchange cruel banter filled with derogatory terms toward people with intellectual disabilities and ends with Downey, Jr. telling Stiller to “never go full retard.” You can read the script HERE and watch parts of this scene on the trailer HERE. Shortly after this script leaked, t-shirts were found on the internet with the slogan, “Never Go Full Retard.” There are many more issues with the movie and those who have previewed it, such as representatives of the National Down Syndrome Congress say that after watching the film, they felt “assaulted” and it is actually worse than the internet activists have been able to show.

The creators and cast of “Tropic Thunder” have chosen to continue on with the release of the movie on Wednesday, August 13th without making any changes or cuts to the film. They claim that the film is satire and “the movie’s humor was aimed not at the disabled but at the foolishness of actors who will go to any length in advancing their careers.” Ha! There’s some irony for ya!

Timothy Shriver, chairman of the Special Olympics, wrote the most wonderful article in the Washington Post today. He describes the cruelty that is shown in our society toward people with intellectual disabilities. I was startled to learn that “Gallup found that more than 60 percent of Americans don’t want a person with an intellectual disability at their child’s school. ” We’ve come so far and I’m so happy we are not the society of 50 years ago, but in a society that aborts over 90% of prenatally diagnosed babies with Down syndrome it’s hard to say that we’ve arrived to the place of acceptance toward people with intellectual differences.

While freedom of speech is one of our greatest gifts, I am hoping that we as a society can make the word “retard” and the abuse of the word “retarded” taboo. I hope that we can teach our children that it is never ok to make fun of someone with intellectual disabilities, whether it is direct or indirect. I hope that we can choose to not do the “PC eyeroll” at people fighting the abuse of the words “mental retardation.” I hope that we will tell Hollywood what is funny and what is not funny. This is not about being “politically correct” this is about dignity and respect.

What am I doing about it?

  • Blogging about this has been a way for me to create awareness and vent my frustration about this film and the abuse of my daughter’s medical diagnosis of mental retardation.
  • Online forums and communities have also been an area I have been making a strong presence in. This has been a great way to get more up-to-date information and get ideas on how to make some changes. There is power in numbers!
  • Boycotting the film. While this may or may not keep a large number of people from seeing this film, it will keep those who love my daughter from watching it. For every 1 person who is interested in this film because of the negative attention it is receiving, I hope that 5 people will be turned off of the movie.
  • I am waiting to see what The ARC and my local Down Syndrome Association recommends regarding physically protesting at the movie theater. If I make a public appearance, I plan on having information handy (and will be calling our news station that did the interview again!)
  • Contacting every local news source has proven to be successful as well!

I expect a lot of people to think I’m being extreme, oversensitive, and time-wasting. However, most people that would think that don’t have a little girl who is going to come home from the playground someday crying because she was called a retard. Most people don’t have typical sons who are going to come home crying because someone called their sister a retard. Although, the name-calling that is bound to ensue my children’s future is the “best case scenario” for my kids. Most people are unaware at the cruel, hateful, violent, dangerous acts that are committed against people with intellectual differences all the time. According to The Arc’s Q&A on abuse of children with intellectual disabilities, the statistics are that children with intellectual disabilites are 4-10 times more likely than non-disabled peers to be victims of crime and twice as likely to be victims of physically and sexual abuse.

The bottom line is this. My beautiful daughter, Darah who has an intellectual disability IS NOT a “retard.” That word has no place in any of our vocabulary, and Hollywood needs to understand that while my daughter does not yet have a voice to stand up for herself, she has a Mamma! And this Mamma is not going to sit back and allow her baby girl to be the butt of the joke!

The Baby Borrowers: Playing House for Real

posted by Dawn on June 27th, 2008

On Wednesday, NBC premiered its newest reality series, The Baby Borrowers.  It’s about five teen couples participating in an “experiment” to care for a baby, toddler, pre-teen, teenager, and an elderly person, along with random pets.  They spend 3 days with each “borrowed” person, in a brand-new house on a cul-de-sac in a nondescript small American town.  The real parents are watching all of the action on a monitor next door, in case something serious happens.  There is also a professional nanny in each home, there to shadow the couples and make sure nothing goes too terribly awry.  The point is to learn about parenting first-hand.  There are no prizes or eliminations. 

When I first heard of this show, I felt skeptical about its overall premise, but I thought I would give it a look-see.  The first episode introduced us to the couples and showed them preparing for the arrival of their baby, as well as a glimpse at their first day with the child.

I’m not gonna lie.  Watching this was painful.  And I am capable of watching a lot of painful stuff, y’all (like this, and this, and this.  Who’s with me?)  I started off taking notes, but stopped after a few minutes.  From that point on, I was trying very hard not to gouge my eyes out with my pen. 

In the introduction, one of the actual “lending” mothers declared, “It’s important for teens to learn about the realities of parenting and be responsible for another little person.”  I couldn’t agree more.  My question is, is this the most effective way to teach them?  Furthermore, what is the purpose of this experiment: to prevent teenage pregnancies?  To dispell any notions kids might have that having a baby is a glamorous thing?  One of NBC’s promos shouted at me, “It’s not tv… it’s birth control!”  So I guess that’s my answer.  Never mind that the poor babies had no idea what was going on and had to live in some sterile house with nervous, inexperienced teenagers for three days.  No wonder they were crying nonstop.

We were able to get a glimpse as to why the couples were participating.  One pair, Morgan and Daton (name game: figure out which is the boy and girl!), said they were using the show as a test for their turbulent relationship.  Morgan said, “Our relationship is at stake here.”  Like we care.  They’re what, 17?  That said, Daton (the guy) was a doll.  Of all the teens, he appeared the most comfortable slipping on a parenting role, and came across very responsible, which was endearing for the young San Diego surfer boy.  Morgan, on the other hand, didn’t want to read her instruction manual at all while their little charge was napping.  Instead, she picked at her split ends and complained of boredom.

Another boy, Sean, was a natural with his baby.  But that didn’t interest him so much as the idea of using this experiment to convince his girlfriend Kelsey that she’s too young to be a mom.  That’s his mission on the show, and he was determined to burst her bubble.  Kelsey, in turn, was more upset by the fact that the baby preferred her boyfriend over her.  Many tears ensued.  That baby girl had some nerve!  

I was pretty creeped out by the narration throughout.  I felt like I was listening to storytime in my worst nightmare.  “Austin and Kelly are a preppy southern couple from Georgia with traditional values.”  Cut to them playing tennis in matching outfits.  Five minutes later, we see Kelly throw a tantrum at the idea of wearing a realistic pregnancy belly.  Austin didn’t display much sympathy for her, and I didn’t blame him.  She was living in a beautiful house with her boyfriend on a national tv show, presumably by choice, and she locks herself into their bathroom before the first day is even over.  The poor guy had to listen to her moan about how he didn’t respect her and that he hurt her and she’s worried that she can’t be with him anymore because he did that.  And this went on for another 10 minutes, complete with multiple bleeped-out expletives and her adamant refusal to play along with the rules, which included wearing that blasted fake belly.  Dear God in Heaven, is this how all teenagers are? 

If they’re not spoiled princesses, then they’re grouchy mean girls with dirty mouths, like Alicea, another participant.  As soon as her 7-month old baby started to fuss about eating (he was teething, poor guy), she threw down the spoon and said, “Beep this, you can starve.” (Or something to that effect.  Remember, I wasn’t writing anything down at this point.)  Hey Alicea, Mom and Dad are watching.  I can’t believe little Karson’s mom waited out the whole evening before coming over and trying to give Alicea some pointers.  Had it been me, I would have said, “Watch your mouth around my child, girl, and change your attitude right now!”  But the mom was surprisingly patient and gave helpful tips.  Alicea didn’t listen.  She said she didn’t take any BEEP from anyone and from that moment on, pouted in her bed.  Her boyfriend Cory was the only one doing anything for the child for the rest of the episode.  And Alicea blames Karson’s mom for that.

I think I’ve made my point.  To be fair, there was one couple, Jordan and Sasha, who seemed to really care about one another and have good heads on their shoulders.  If you like watching teenagers get a taste of “reality” and you enjoy seeing them pout, then this show is for you.  If I wanted to hear them whine this much, I’d go back to teaching middle schoolers, so it’s safe to say I won’t be watching again.

More reviews about the show:

from Variety

from the L.A. Times

Did you catch The Baby Borrowers?  What are your thoughts on reality tv as a tool for educating teens?  Should the “lending” families be criticized for putting their unwitting kids in that situation?  Like me, were you put off by the fact that the unmarried teen couples were sleeping together in their own master bedrooms?

Proud member of Mom Blog Network
Alltop, all the cool kids (and me)